<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Conservation Science Blog &#187; Fire ecology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.klamathconservation.org/scienceblog/?cat=5&#038;feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.klamathconservation.org/scienceblog</link>
	<description>New science relevant to conservation in western North America</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 May 2014 17:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>The forgotten stage of forest succession: early-successional ecosystems on forest sites</title>
		<link>http://www.klamathconservation.org/scienceblog/?p=109</link>
		<comments>http://www.klamathconservation.org/scienceblog/?p=109#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 18:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carlos Carroll]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Endangered species management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fire ecology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://klamathconservation.org/scienceblog/?p=109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new review of the ecological role of early-successional forests by Swanson and others, including Dominick Dellasala of NCCSP, is forthcoming in the journal Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. The authors conclude: Early-successional forest ecosystems that develop after stand-replacing &#8230; <a href="http://www.klamathconservation.org/scienceblog/?p=109">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.klamathconservation.org/scienceblog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=109</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
